The situation
Analysts spend a surprising share of their week on small, repetitive jobs: writing the first version of a query, explaining what a piece of code does, describing a chart in a sentence, or tidying notes after a meeting. None of it is difficult, but it adds up.
The problem
Language-model tools could clearly help, but a team can't simply let everyone loose on them. These tools write confident, fluent text whether or not it is right. They can invent a column that doesn't exist or give a total that is slightly wrong, and a wrong number that reads well is more dangerous than an obvious mistake.
What we did
We started by sorting jobs into two lists. The first was work where a draft is helpful and a person can quickly check it: first drafts of queries, explanations of existing code, summaries of long documents, wording for report commentary. The second was work where the answer has to be exactly right and nobody will check it: arithmetic, reported figures and anything that goes straight to a customer.
For the first list, the team agreed some simple habits. Always run and test generated queries against known results. Give the tool the real table definitions instead of letting it guess. Keep sensitive customer data out of tools that send text elsewhere. For the second list, calculations stayed in code.
The outcome
Routine drafting got faster, and analysts had more of their week for the thinking that only they can do: understanding the business question and judging whether an answer makes sense. The checks kept quality where it was.
What it meant for the business
The team got the benefit of the tools without turning accuracy into a gamble. Everyone also knew where the line was, which made it easy to bring new people in.
Could this work for you?
If your team is curious about AI tools but unsure where they help and where they cause trouble, a short working session to draw that line is a good place to start. We help set the guidelines, then test them on a real piece of your work.
Related services: AI solutions and automation, Data strategy and planning
This project was led by our founder, Achyutanand Jha, in an earlier role. The client is not named, and figures are those reported at the time.